Jump to content


Heads Up !!! Google Chrome is now Add-On able


15 replies to this topic

#1 puttachinku

    BitComet Beta Tester

  • Beta Tester
  • 155 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 27 January 2010 - 04:02 PM

Ya,I've been waiting for this update from Google chrome :D :D :D .new version for-filled most wanted feature.How about a Bitcomet extension for Chrome :wub: ?

EDIT: IT'S NOT BITCOMET EXTENSION FOR GOOGLE CHROME IT'S GOOGLE CHROME EXTENSION FOR BITCOMET!

Edited by Puttachinku, 04 February 2010 - 03:13 AM.


#2 puttachinku

    BitComet Beta Tester

  • Beta Tester
  • 155 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 31 January 2010 - 07:00 PM

No replay ? :(

#3 kluelos

    Support Team

  • BitComet Tech Support
  • 8,070 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Here, at the moment.

Posted 31 January 2010 - 10:54 PM

Since the BitComet team is managing their own browser variant, they probably don't intend to support another. Gavin can tell you for certain, but I'd be surprised at any other answer. They haven't even created a BC add-on for CometBird, and I would expect to see that long before a Chrome extension came along.

Among the expectations for both Mozilla and Chrome add-ons is multiple OS support. BC is windows-only. Adapting for, e.g., *nix would be a large undertaking, and would be done on its own before doing it as a browser add-on. The likelihood of this happening is probably very small. unix versions have be requested before, and the development team has never indicated any interest in doing this.


""When you seek it, you cannot find it; prob'ly cuz you stuck it in that cupboard in the shed and put paint cans in front of it."
– Billy-Bob Gautama




#4 puttachinku

    BitComet Beta Tester

  • Beta Tester
  • 155 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 01 February 2010 - 02:35 AM

ya but we already have a Firefox IE extension :huh: , we can get it under integration tab you may call it as an integration but, it's an extension right?

#5 kluelos

    Support Team

  • BitComet Tech Support
  • 8,070 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Here, at the moment.

Posted 01 February 2010 - 05:47 AM

It is an extension, but beyond that you'd have to know the details, which I don't. It is quite possibly an emulation, not adaptation of the actual IE code. This is another thing entirely. The two tasks aren't comparable.


""When you seek it, you cannot find it; prob'ly cuz you stuck it in that cupboard in the shed and put paint cans in front of it."
– Billy-Bob Gautama




#6 puttachinku

    BitComet Beta Tester

  • Beta Tester
  • 155 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 01 February 2010 - 11:16 PM

ya I propose the same thing.whatever it is, still it's called as an extension.I am just saying that what we have for Mozilla firefox and IE now can all so be implemented for chrome.

#7 puttachinku

    BitComet Beta Tester

  • Beta Tester
  • 155 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 03 February 2010 - 09:19 PM

well..........?

#8 kluelos

    Support Team

  • BitComet Tech Support
  • 8,070 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Here, at the moment.

Posted 04 February 2010 - 01:18 AM

There isn't a BitComet extension. Not for any browser. I think Opera internally supports bittorrent, but it's their own client. You said, "A FireFox IE extension", which I understood to mean the "Open in IE Tab" extension -- you can have a page rendered by the IE engine rather than by Gecko. That's nothing to do with BitComet.


""When you seek it, you cannot find it; prob'ly cuz you stuck it in that cupboard in the shed and put paint cans in front of it."
– Billy-Bob Gautama




#9 sophia0316

    BitComet Fairy Princess

  • Moderator
  • 368 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Shanghai

Posted 04 February 2010 - 02:38 AM

Puttachinku, thank you for your support. But at present, our team do not have a plan to develop a Chrome extension. But things may change in near future, though I am not sure for now. I have forwarded your request to the team. :)

#10 puttachinku

    BitComet Beta Tester

  • Beta Tester
  • 155 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 04 February 2010 - 03:17 AM

I really don't understand that how you are missing the fact that in Bitcomet option>Integration tab we can clearly see the IE Integration and firefox integration and they were clearly stated as extensions, and you are right there isn't any Bitcomet extension for Browser on the contrary those were browser extensions for Bitcomet :) mystery solved :D I think my subtitle misguided you sorry my mistake.is there any way to edit the subtitle?
So my propose is to have google chrome extension for Bitcomet under integration as we can get IE extension and Firefox Extension now

#11 kluelos

    Support Team

  • BitComet Tech Support
  • 8,070 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Here, at the moment.

Posted 04 February 2010 - 07:23 AM

Oh, ok. You had me scratching my head, there. You want the BitComet download manager to work with Chrome, too.

I tried to advise them, "when in Chrome...", but they haven't listened.


""When you seek it, you cannot find it; prob'ly cuz you stuck it in that cupboard in the shed and put paint cans in front of it."
– Billy-Bob Gautama




#12 peteyt

    Seeder

  • Members
  • 7 posts

Posted 12 December 2011 - 10:00 PM

Hate to bring up a dead post but I noticed this a few times. Chrome is very popular now and I think adding the integration would just make BitComet even better.

#13 The UnUsual Suspect

    Guardian Eagle

  • Administrators
  • 8,695 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Guarding the nest
  • Interests:Soaring through the sky, fishing and nesting in tall trees...

Posted 13 December 2011 - 06:35 AM

A chrome extension would be nice, I use chrome often, it's a good browser and I'm not to happy with firefox, they don't give you time to learn a version before they slap a new one on top. Right now, this very moment we should be on firefox version 4.7, not 8.0, it's just crazy, like they think new higher numbers are going to impress someone.

*rant over*
READ THIS before posting

Download All Versions of BitComet Here!
Guides and Tutorials!
Making and Posting Screenshots!



Posted Image

If We don't reply to your post within 24 hours, feel free to send me a pm
Posted Image


#14 puttachinku

    BitComet Beta Tester

  • Beta Tester
  • 155 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 13 December 2011 - 02:42 PM

since it already been dug-up let's just talk about it. on February 2010 sophia said in near future they might work on it so, are we there yet? :)

#15 necrose1

    peer

  • Members
  • 2 posts

Posted 20 September 2012 - 02:11 AM

as far as a Linux Version porting to it I think you could use Wine Wrapper , makes a Linux/Mac/BSD etc program but you will need Wine (Windows App Layer)

http://www.winehq.or...bindlls-wrapper

as it will trick Linux into thinking it is native port of App shows on use menus but effectively is runing with windows xp compatibility Layer on Linux ,


Shareaza dose this. among others.

I am no coder but as well porting BC to .Net source would also allow this as a native port Via mono , The .net compiler for *Nix


With some Modest Trouble I can boot Into Linux and Run Everquest from my windows partition or even BC Installer for Linux with not to much of an Issue , Just writing A Launcher Shell script and making it Link to start menu with a BC icon's a we bit of work but yet doable.


The wine wrapper I think tho makes a native Executable or a elf File for Linux which launches the program and the wine layer seamlessly . and far less painfully. as well I think it allows the app to run more natively on Linux /*NIX

#16 acdcat

    Seeder

  • Members
  • 7 posts

Posted 26 September 2012 - 05:27 PM

i just want the video download option in chrome