w3ee

Your examples do not convince me completely. I see a bug, but you say that it is not, of course we can not reach an agreement. If you want, I can create my own torrent, share it to my friends, and they will gives me a packages with a constant speed, while I will note the time. Such statistics will convince you?

Well, if this is not a bug ... Let's take a test. I will leave only a first file in the torrent and see how fast it will be downloaded, then I will include other files and give highest priority to the second file. This file will be downloaded in 5-10 times slower. Is this normal? I still think it's a bug. In fact, it is indeed possible, just not enough option for the priorities, which would be completely turned off the other files, while the highest is not downloaded.

I dont know how it is possible, I'm just a simply user, not developer, therefore, easier for me to check it out in practice. Now compare my screenshot from BitTorrent and screenshot "greywizard" from uTorrent. The difference is obvious, 14.8% vs 1.1% is better than 17.8% vs 41.0%. Besides, I'm not looking for the most effective way to download a torrent, I'm just trying to download most files in order during some time. By the way, thanks you for that paid so much attention to my post, to be honest I did not expect)

I know about "Download Order", this is exactly what I love in BitComet. I understand it, but as I mentioned earlier, other torrent clients (uTorrent for example) never ignore the priorities, it means that if there is file with hight priorities, the remaining files will be inactive until the first file will not be fully loaded. And all this is happening almost without losing speed. How to explain this? You showered me technical information of the protocols, but I see that part of what I want is in BitComet, and another part in uTorrent. Oh, if I could merge them) All I need - the same work priorities, as in other torrent clients, but with the ability to appoint "Download Order". I use torrents because for me it is the most available method to downloading files. I realized that what I need is impossible in your program. Very sorry.

Sorry if I was inattentive, but I just want to downloads one file in list at a time without constant switching manually, I do not see particular problem in this, but no torrent-client has this function. I just checked it out. If I turn off all the files in the torrent, and leave only one, my speed will be about 320KB/s. If I leave the all files, then my speed 360KB /s, but is divided among all the other files.

This would give the real speedup, if I had infinite speed Internet connection. But now it turns out that I use my traffic to intercept other people's packages. Besides, if I download file alone, that is, all packages come to me, still happens the same thing, that is, files with a low priority downloads with files with hight priority. First time I tried to do that on other torrent clients. For example on uTorrent I was choose high and normal priorities for 2 first files and low priority for other files, and downloading them first. There was no loss of speed, but it was uncomfortably. When I heared about BitComet, I thought that my problems was solved. But unfortunately BitComet has this lack. Probably I'll have to find a new torrent-client :(

I like BitComet because it is possible to download any files, contained in torrent, in turn. But BitComet often ignore the priorities and when he finally finished a first file with the highest priority, the remaining files with lowest priority was on 50-60% downloaded. Is it possible to do so, that downloading files are REALLY downloaded in turn? Sorry, but screenshot contains russian language. The idea is that hiest priority file on screenshot on 17.8%, but other files on 30%-40%. Do you think this is ok? ISP: dynamic.mts-nn.ru Download Speed: 3 Mbits/s == 384 KBytes/s Upload Speed: 768 Kbuts/s == 96 KBytes/s Hardware: Conexant USB ADSL WAN Modem OS: Microsoft Windows 7 fully updated AntiVirus: ESET Smart Security 4.0.467.0 Software Firewall: ESET Firewall AntiSpyware: I sad only ESET...