Rozy1 Posted March 24, 2010 Share Posted March 24, 2010 (edited) I have BitComet version 1.07, connecting with a DSL modem/router combo. It is an Actiontec Q1000. Windows Vista OS without the Windows firewall. Panda Antivirus with firewall, and exception to allow BC. Previously, with my Cox cable I was set up correctly with a green light, so I am familiar with port forwarding. Now, however, I can't seem to get a green light no matter what I try. I have linked to my settings here. http://i872.photobucket.com/albums/ab282/Rozy63/ipconfig.jpg http://i872.photobucket.com/albums/ab282/Rozy63/tcpsettings.jpg http://i872.photobucket.com/albums/ab282/Rozy63/routersettings.jpg http://i872.photobucket.com/albums/ab282/Rozy63/bcoptions.jpg http://i872.photobucket.com/albums/ab282/Rozy63/bitcomet-1.jpg http://i872.photobucket.com/albums/ab282/Rozy63/portchecktool.jpg Please let me know if I am missing something. Also, am I at risk by posting my IP and my associated open port here? Also noticed that the "listen port of TCP" in picture 5 shows zero. Is this the problem? Thanks for your help. Edited March 24, 2010 by Rozy1 (see edit history) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kluelos Posted March 25, 2010 Share Posted March 25, 2010 TCP listen port set to 0 is definitely a problem. I'm not sure how you did that, I didn't think it was possible to set TCP and UDP to different ports. In your P/O/W for bitComet, what is your listen port set to? I want to find that out before getting into any of the rest of this. I am unconvinced of any danger at all in listing your iP address, given that it's just leased and that it will change. But there's never any danger in exposing a 192.168.xxx.xxx address, since these are all private LAN's by definition and cannot be accessed from outside. (Most routers will refuse to try because it's a reserved address.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greywizard Posted March 25, 2010 Share Posted March 25, 2010 I would go for a clean reinstall of BitComet first. If it shows different port numbers for TCP and UDP then something is fishy. I haven't met that yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rozy1 Posted March 25, 2010 Author Share Posted March 25, 2010 In your P/O/W for bitComet, what is your listen port set to? I want to find that out before getting into any of the rest of this. I'm sorry, I looked everywhere but couldn't figure out what P/O/W means kluelos. In the options, the listen port is set to 49155, chosen to be in the quick range from the faq's. I will try for a fresh install (update to 1.19 perhaps?) in the morning. I'll do some dl'ing and seeding overnight as the speeds are not that bad. (40-260 kB/s down with 3 files going) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kluelos Posted March 25, 2010 Share Posted March 25, 2010 P/O/W is what we call it due to a very ill-advised name-change. They used to be called 'Preferences", then one day we found some coder had renamed them "options", so all of the answers given before were now confusing. We started calling them Preferences/Options/Whatever-they're-calling-them-this-week, hence P/O/W. Whatever you understand them as. The program configuration choices. I'd agree, go with the clean install, this is not supposed to happen that the TCP and UDP ports can be different. That they are suggests something is very messed up in an unusual way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rozy1 Posted March 25, 2010 Author Share Posted March 25, 2010 (edited) Ok, I just installed version 1.19 and the port checker tool says the port is not blocked. Here is a screen shot of the statistics though still showing a router problem. http://i872.photobucket.com/albums/ab282/Rozy63/new-1.jpg I think it must be the router because I disabled the Panda firewall and checked again and still got a yellow light. Edited March 25, 2010 by Rozy1 (see edit history) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kluelos Posted March 25, 2010 Share Posted March 25, 2010 if you've done a clean uninstall as Wiz and I suggested, and you've still got different ports, then I think we need to punt this one to Gavin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greywizard Posted March 25, 2010 Share Posted March 25, 2010 The keyword here being "clean". You should have uninstalled your BitComet version. You should have manually checked that the BitComet folder in Program Files is gone. Also, you should have checked that the BitComet folder in Users\%userprofile%\AppData\Local\VirtualStore\Program Files is gone, as well. Only after that you should have reinstalled the last version of BitComet. Did you go about it like this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rozy1 Posted March 25, 2010 Author Share Posted March 25, 2010 (edited) The keyword here being "clean". You should have uninstalled your BitComet version. You should have manually checked that the BitComet folder in Program Files is gone. Also, you should have checked that the BitComet folder in Users\%userprofile%\AppData\Local\VirtualStore\Program Files is gone, as well. Only after that you should have reinstalled the last version of BitComet. Did you go about it like this? Well I am apparently not getting a clean uninstall. Upon reinstallation, I show files still in the queue, and the port it's listening to is the old one I had set. I did all of the above steps, plus checked the registry. I'll try again. Would you know what file I should be looking for perhaps? I did do a windows search for "Bitcomet" and deleted all of the folders found. Edited March 25, 2010 by Rozy1 (see edit history) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kluelos Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 You're looking for .xml files in the program directory and the %appdata% directory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greywizard Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 As kluelos said, you should additionally check for the Documents and Settings\%userprofile%\Application Data\BitComet folder. As your previous version was installed in Program Files (I presume) you shouldn't normally find anything in the AppData folder, but check it nonetheless. We're all going here on the assumption that your v.1.07 was installed in the default Program Files folder. If you know it was elsewhere you should check that place. And you can check the actual path to your BitComet folder, by looking at the shortcut properties page. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rozy1 Posted March 26, 2010 Author Share Posted March 26, 2010 (edited) Thank you for your help. I finally got it uninstalled with a few registry deletions too. Upon reinstall, I find I now have a green light! http://i872.photobucket.com/albums/ab282/Rozy63/greenlight.jpg I did no port forwarding, however. Maybe Upnp worked? Should I change the port to the 'faster' range, or just leave well enough alone? Update; I tried 49155 and it was blocked with and without port forwarding. Port 8592 worked. Edited March 26, 2010 by Rozy1 (see edit history) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greywizard Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 Well, you can see that it says "UPnP NAT port mapping: Added". Therefore, it's clear that your ports are forwarded by UPnP. Since it works now, as they say it's better to: "Never touch a running system". B) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now